HURIWA Slams New Acting CJN Over Controversial 2019 Imo Guber Judgment

The Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA) has voiced significant concerns regarding the appointment of Justice Kudirat Motonmori Kekere-Ekun as the Acting Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), succeeding Justice Olukayode Ariwoola.

In a statement issued by Emmanuel Onwubiko, HURIWA’s national coordinator, the association expressed skepticism about the new Acting CJN’s appointment, citing several contentious issues.

HURIWA noted that Justice Kekere-Ekun’s career has been marked by controversy, specifically referencing her role in the 2019 Imo State gubernatorial case.

“She is widely remembered for delivering the judgment in the 2019 Imo State gubernatorial case, where a candidate who came fourth in the election was declared the winner,” the statement read.

HURIWA described this judgment as one of the most controversial in the Supreme Court’s history and a significant turning point in the perceived decline of the judiciary.

Additionally, HURIWA raised concerns about Justice Kekere-Ekun’s integrity, highlighting unresolved allegations about her failure to declare her assets as legally required.

“Despite these serious accusations, the Code of Conduct Bureau has not pursued an investigation, leaving many to question the transparency and accountability within the judiciary,” the statement noted.

The association also criticized the political dynamics surrounding Justice Kekere-Ekun’s elevation, suggesting that her appointment may be influenced by political patronage from President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

“The circumstances surrounding Justice Kekere-Ekun’s elevation to CJN suggest that she enjoys significant political backing, particularly from President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, who has a well-documented affinity for individuals from Lagos, where Justice Kekere-Ekun hails from,” the statement said.

HURIWA warned that such political connections could compromise her independence and hinder much-needed judicial reforms.

Furthermore, HURIWA expressed doubt that the Presidency or the National Assembly, which they claim lacks the independence to challenge her appointment, would oppose her becoming the substantive CJN.

“With the current political dynamics, neither the Presidency nor the National Assembly is likely to oppose her becoming the substantive CJN,” the group stated.

In light of these issues, HURIWA holds a pessimistic view of the future of Nigeria’s judiciary under Justice Kekere-Ekun’s leadership.

“The judiciary, as it stands, cannot deliver justice to ordinary Nigerians, as it appears to serve only the interests of the highest bidders and politically exposed persons,” the statement concluded.

The association fears that the transition from Justice Ariwoola to Justice Kekere-Ekun signifies a continuation of the judiciary’s decline rather than a positive change.

HURIWA argues that without a judiciary that is independent, transparent, and committed to upholding the rule of law, Nigeria’s democracy is at risk, and the quest for justice remains an elusive dream for the common Nigerian.